<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alternatives to Piracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wizkidsound.com/blog/2009/12/alternatives-to-piracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wizkidsound.com/blog/2009/12/alternatives-to-piracy/</link>
	<description>Modern Recording Studio in Atlanta, GA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:29:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wizkid Sound</title>
		<link>http://wizkidsound.com/blog/2009/12/alternatives-to-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-2120</link>
		<dc:creator>Wizkid Sound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizkidsound.com/blog/?p=507#comment-2120</guid>
		<description>Apparently New Zealanders think watching porn online is worse than pirating music. Interesting. &lt;a href=&quot;http://torrentfreak.com/watching-porn-online-more-acceptable-than-pirating-music-100113/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://torrentfreak.com/watching-porn-online-mo...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently New Zealanders think watching porn online is worse than pirating music. Interesting. <a target="_blank" href="http://torrentfreak.com/watching-porn-online-more-acceptable-than-pirating-music-100113/"  rel="nofollow"></a><a target="_blank" href="http://torrentfreak.com/watching-porn-online-mo.."  rel="nofollow">http://torrentfreak.com/watching-porn-online-mo..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robkischuk</title>
		<link>http://wizkidsound.com/blog/2009/12/alternatives-to-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-2117</link>
		<dc:creator>robkischuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizkidsound.com/blog/?p=507#comment-2117</guid>
		<description>What does Rhapsody do when I use Rhapsody To Go and sync the song onto my Sandisk Sansa player?  Does the Sandisk player somehow count plays and then phone home when I sync?  Or does the act of synching a song credit the artist?  If the latter, am I then playing fair if I periodically synch the songs I&#039;ve burned to my player to compensate the artist even as I listen to them on a burned CD?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, how much of this is relevant when this is the state of streaming royalties compensation: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.toomuchjoy.com/?p=1397&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.toomuchjoy.com/?p=1397&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does Rhapsody do when I use Rhapsody To Go and sync the song onto my Sandisk Sansa player?  Does the Sandisk player somehow count plays and then phone home when I sync?  Or does the act of synching a song credit the artist?  If the latter, am I then playing fair if I periodically synch the songs I&#39;ve burned to my player to compensate the artist even as I listen to them on a burned CD?</p>
<p>Also, how much of this is relevant when this is the state of streaming royalties compensation: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.toomuchjoy.com/?p=1397"  rel="nofollow">http://www.toomuchjoy.com/?p=1397</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Dyson</title>
		<link>http://wizkidsound.com/blog/2009/12/alternatives-to-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Dyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizkidsound.com/blog/?p=507#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>Currently, yes, it is piracy. Rhapsody pays royalties based on plays...you burning a copy of someone else&#039;s CD but using the excuse that it&#039;s available on Rhapsody circumvents the royalty payment. Is this ridiculous? I think so. As we move towards streaming and &quot;music as a service&quot; the problem of you burning a cd will become less and less relevant because your next car will have Rhapsody or Lala or Apple On-The-Go built in and you want want to fuss with CDs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the feedback. Sorry for the delay, that tofurkey sure packs a mean tryptophan punch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently, yes, it is piracy. Rhapsody pays royalties based on plays&#8230;you burning a copy of someone else&#39;s CD but using the excuse that it&#39;s available on Rhapsody circumvents the royalty payment. Is this ridiculous? I think so. As we move towards streaming and &#8220;music as a service&#8221; the problem of you burning a cd will become less and less relevant because your next car will have Rhapsody or Lala or Apple On-The-Go built in and you want want to fuss with CDs.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback. Sorry for the delay, that tofurkey sure packs a mean tryptophan punch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pimpfresh</title>
		<link>http://wizkidsound.com/blog/2009/12/alternatives-to-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-2109</link>
		<dc:creator>pimpfresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizkidsound.com/blog/?p=507#comment-2109</guid>
		<description>That is one of the ridiculous paradoxes that our currently bizarre laws on music &quot;ownership&quot; create. How is it possible to simultaneously &quot;own&quot; a copy of something while it is ultimately owned by someone else (the copyright holder and/or the master recording owner)? CDs masked this conflict because you were being sold a physical thing, and the idea was that you owned that physical thing and a non-exclusive limited license to use the property on it. The issue becomes murky with MP3s because though there is no physical product, people still consider MP3s as something they &quot;own.&quot;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the best solution to this problem is to pay a small fee every time you listen or &quot;enjoy&quot; the music, without the complications of owning it. This is in essence what streaming services are offering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is one of the ridiculous paradoxes that our currently bizarre laws on music &#8220;ownership&#8221; create. How is it possible to simultaneously &#8220;own&#8221; a copy of something while it is ultimately owned by someone else (the copyright holder and/or the master recording owner)? CDs masked this conflict because you were being sold a physical thing, and the idea was that you owned that physical thing and a non-exclusive limited license to use the property on it. The issue becomes murky with MP3s because though there is no physical product, people still consider MP3s as something they &#8220;own.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I think the best solution to this problem is to pay a small fee every time you listen or &#8220;enjoy&#8221; the music, without the complications of owning it. This is in essence what streaming services are offering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robkischuk</title>
		<link>http://wizkidsound.com/blog/2009/12/alternatives-to-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator>robkischuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizkidsound.com/blog/?p=507#comment-2073</guid>
		<description>&quot;Piracy&quot; is becoming an increasingly interesting word.  Consider my Rhapsody subscription.  I pay not just for Rhapsody, but an extra couple of bucks a month for the &quot;to go&quot; edition.  I have a Rhapsody compliant MP3 player that lets me listen to any Rhapsody music I want anywhere at no additional charge.  My car doesn&#039;t have an aux input I can plug that MP3 player into - if it did, I could listen to Rhapsody music anywhere.  I could add an aux input for a couple hundred bucks in aftermarket equipment plus labor.  Rumor has it there&#039;s an Android app coming that would let me stream Rhapsody to my phone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So the question is, is it piracy if I burn a copy of someone else&#039;s CD that&#039;s available on Rhapsody so I can listen in my car?  Sure it&#039;s a problem if I cancel my Rhapsody subscription, but apart from that, does the tool I use to listen to music I have rights to listen to in my car matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Piracy&#8221; is becoming an increasingly interesting word.  Consider my Rhapsody subscription.  I pay not just for Rhapsody, but an extra couple of bucks a month for the &#8220;to go&#8221; edition.  I have a Rhapsody compliant MP3 player that lets me listen to any Rhapsody music I want anywhere at no additional charge.  My car doesn&#39;t have an aux input I can plug that MP3 player into &#8211; if it did, I could listen to Rhapsody music anywhere.  I could add an aux input for a couple hundred bucks in aftermarket equipment plus labor.  Rumor has it there&#39;s an Android app coming that would let me stream Rhapsody to my phone.</p>
<p>So the question is, is it piracy if I burn a copy of someone else&#39;s CD that&#39;s available on Rhapsody so I can listen in my car?  Sure it&#39;s a problem if I cancel my Rhapsody subscription, but apart from that, does the tool I use to listen to music I have rights to listen to in my car matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robkischuk</title>
		<link>http://wizkidsound.com/blog/2009/12/alternatives-to-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-2066</link>
		<dc:creator>robkischuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizkidsound.com/blog/?p=507#comment-2066</guid>
		<description>&quot;Piracy&quot; is becoming an increasingly interesting word.  Consider my Rhapsody subscription.  I pay not just for Rhapsody, but an extra couple of bucks a month for the &quot;to go&quot; edition.  I have a Rhapsody compliant MP3 player that lets me listen to any Rhapsody music I want anywhere at no additional charge.  My car doesn&#039;t have an aux input I can plug that MP3 player into - if it did, I could listen to Rhapsody music anywhere.  I could add an aux input for a couple hundred bucks in aftermarket equipment plus labor.  Rumor has it there&#039;s an Android app coming that would let me stream Rhapsody to my phone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So the question is, is it piracy if I burn a copy of someone else&#039;s CD that&#039;s available on Rhapsody so I can listen in my car?  Sure it&#039;s a problem if I cancel my Rhapsody subscription, but apart from that, does the tool I use to listen to music I have rights to listen to in my car matter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Piracy&#8221; is becoming an increasingly interesting word.  Consider my Rhapsody subscription.  I pay not just for Rhapsody, but an extra couple of bucks a month for the &#8220;to go&#8221; edition.  I have a Rhapsody compliant MP3 player that lets me listen to any Rhapsody music I want anywhere at no additional charge.  My car doesn&#39;t have an aux input I can plug that MP3 player into &#8211; if it did, I could listen to Rhapsody music anywhere.  I could add an aux input for a couple hundred bucks in aftermarket equipment plus labor.  Rumor has it there&#39;s an Android app coming that would let me stream Rhapsody to my phone.</p>
<p>So the question is, is it piracy if I burn a copy of someone else&#39;s CD that&#39;s available on Rhapsody so I can listen in my car?  Sure it&#39;s a problem if I cancel my Rhapsody subscription, but apart from that, does the tool I use to listen to music I have rights to listen to in my car matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
